The Question Stephen King Can’t Answer For Me

I picked up two things from the library awhile back: On Writing and a collection of King’s short stories. A funny thing happened.

On Writing was great. A person must be tolerant of the F word (and a couple of others) in order to enjoy it–it’s Stephen King, he does that. In this book, I saw great writing happen. First he showed it, then he talked about it later on. King taught me why I am the writer I am, and I took another step forward into owning my literary innerspace due to his honesty.

By the way, my desk is in the corner.

Just After Sunset–well, I didn’t get through the whole thing. This was where funny things started happening. I don’t pretend to be a master of the short story. I don’t have a natural affinity for the form, and so I just don’t bother working with it a lot. When I have done, it’s seemed to act as a collection pond for all the sludge at the bottom of my idea bucket. It’s just terrible.

Reading King, I found myself unsurprised. “Yeah, and then the power balance tips that way when she hits him, and then it tips the other way when he tries to kill her, and then it tips back–yep, there’s his crucial weakness revealed, and she’s won…”

I understand the short story form. I’ve read it and read it since forever. So what is this blase reaction to a life-and-death struggle? Is it all Ray Bradbury’s fault for terrifying me with The Veldt at too early an age, for presenting me with a hideous reflection of what I might be as a child of parents? Continue reading

Biblical Hope

Featured

I am not an Advent type of person. We Anabaptists have a long-standing tradition of decrying the frivolous traditions of the rest of Christianity, thus rendering ourselves a photographic negative of the surrounding religious culture.

Small and Unlikely Things

Cultural habits aside, our (nondenominational Bible-believing) pastor’s Advent sermon on biblical hope connected a lot of things for me in a lot of ways. He opened with this thought:

Think back through the history of the Bible. Abraham, who didn’t exactly believe God, at least not all the time. Samson, a drunken womanizer. David, a power-mongering adulterer, who was also not the best father. Solomon, the unwise wise man. And finally, a young virgin in an out-of-the-way corner of a vast empire.

God often begins with small people and unlikely things. I think this is the premise of the Advent season.

He spoke of rain. It rained too much this spring; too little this summer. For our farming community, life can become a matter of standing there in the field with hands on hips, eyeballing the sky and saying, “How about today, God?”

But we have no confident assurance that it will rain, or not rain. Continue reading

The Writer You Don’t Want to Meet Online (And the One You Do)

Because I’m in writing circles online, it seems that every time I log on, somebody somewhere is talking about a challenge with their current project. I’ve heard the advice that it may not be such a good idea to hash through the ups and downs publicly. It becomes part of the impression you make online. Choosing wisely seems…wise.

Over the last two years of exponentially-increased social media noise, there’s been more than one instance where I’ve seen what amounts to a really unprofessional persona presented. I know I’ve thought about at least one Twitter presence, “Wow, the complaining just never stops. Does this person know their social media persona can be defined by the word ‘whiny’?”

There have been others where I’ve been able to gauge where the writer is (and isn’t) in proficiency by the detailed problems they’ve publicly aired. If I can tell, then so can the agents and acquisitions folks they hope to impress. Talking about mistakes is a fine way to talk about solutions. But it’s important to get to the solutions. Continue reading

Lest We Forget

Featured

On the third weekend of October, the weather in Regina, Saskatchewan was fair. As we pulled up to the Ring Road, we spotted a young man standing on the boulevard with a backpack and a sign. The sign read, Travelling Broke, Very Hungry. Anything Will Help. Since the youngster was a healthy specimen, neither filthy nor unattractive, and had puppy-dog eyes–in short, he looked much like your average university student–it didn’t take long before a lady walked over with a Tim Horton’s sandwich bag and invited him back to the restaurant to sit down.

He was standing in a place where a person could get a job and buy their own lunch, but he seemed oblivious to that. Right now, Saskatchewan and Manitoba have two of the most stable regional economies in the world. A lot of people in the States would give their left arm for the opportunities the prairie has managed to retain in the Great Recession.

In the 1930s, during the dustbowl years, Dave’s Grandpa drove a covered wagon across Manitoba from south of Winnipeg to the western hill country. There, he homesteaded a quarter section of bushland. He cleared trees and broke the soil by horsepower and man-sweat, since a tractor was unaffordable. He built the house in which he raised his family with his own hands.

Most food was homegrown and homemade. Sugar was a luxury item. Grandpa grew a huge garden and supplemented the winter rations by selling oak fence posts with pre-sharpened ends–all done by axe and saw. Seventy-odd years later, at the age of 90, he sat with an old friend at his birthday party and reminisced about how hard work cured many an ill.

Twenty years after Dave’s grandparents traversed the plains as some of the last true pioneers, my grandparents stepped off a boat in Montreal, fresh from Britain. They were directed west by the immigration administration of the time. They settled in Winnipeg’s North End.

My grandfather was an old-world upholsterer, trained by apprenticeship. He had skills far beyond an assembly-line worker in a furniture factory, and he retrained the marginalized to build custom furniture. A polio victim, he had been unable to go to war for his country; a gentle man, he went to war against different things. He never quite learned to live with the fact that someone else fought for his freedom.

We expect corporations to serve us, the almighty consumer class. We demand alternative fuels, but woe betide if the semi-trucks don’t have the groceries on the shelf when we want them. We demand justice for the poor, tweeting the indignation from our iPhones ($375-$649) and laptops ($299-$3000) while soup kitchens struggle to fundraise.

Going to the soup kitchen to help? Someone else will do that. After all, someone else always has.

In the New York Times, in support of the Occupy movement, Paul Krugman wrote,

In the first act, bankers took advantage of deregulation to run wild (and pay themselves princely sums), inflating huge bubbles through reckless lending.

The bankers, the government, and the myriad citizens who did not manage their personal credit all said: someone else can pony up.

During World War II, the Germans bombed England in a siege that, some estimate, required fifty years of rebuilding. Along the Mersey, a family still found the pennies to go out for a movie. Money well-spent; it saved their lives. When they returned, their house had been reduced to rubble. My grandmother lived three doors down from them.

Most of my Canadian small town served in the Allied war effort. There are lists of the dead on monuments in every town around Manitoba. The monuments are not lost behind urban sprawl, easily ignored by a generation permanently plugged into earbuds; they stand out all the more as the towns slowly die of attrition.

Someone else fought those wars.

In western Manitoba, businesses are importing workers from China and Mexico because Canadians will not do the jobs in manufacturing. Even if it puts fuel in the car and pork on the supermarket shelf, it does not offer an instant gratification lifestyle.

Locally, some of these immigrant families are buying upscale houses as a co-operative venture, sharing the excessive living space among extended relatives. They pay off one house, then buy another and gain a little more room to breathe. They take entry-level jobs and seek retraining. In short, they work to earn what they have. By the time they’re done, every family in the clan has a good lifestyle.

Are these people willing to settle for less? No. They’re willing to think long-term. They have ethics. They realize there’s more to life than what I want, right this minute.

This is neither capitalist nor communist. It’s different from our self-gratifying culture. It’s someone else’s wisdom.

In the second act, the bubbles burst — but bankers were bailed out by taxpayers, with remarkably few strings attached, even as ordinary workers continued to suffer the consequences of the bankers’ sins. (Krugman)

The American banks’ scrabble for self-preservation at the expense of families and taxpayers is a pudding-proof that Canada did well to regulate lending. And justice does need to be served, because it hasn’t been happening.

But corporate justice is not the only kind. There is also the kind that grinds an axe not for war (or fruitless discussion), but for self-determination.

This country’s prosperity was built of the sweat of hard labour and blood shed in time of war. It was built with immigrant ethics. The love of our forebears constrains us. This is what it means to be Canadian.

Yet we insist on defining our Canadianness only in terms of not being someone else.

In the third act, if we truly wish for a better future, we’ll be who we are: the living legacy of settlers and soldiers. The children of immigrants who understood that hope has reins, and they can be seized.

Lest we forget to honour what someone else has placed in the balance.

Thoughts on the New York Times and Mike Pearl

I’ve been aware for some time that a reporter from the New York Times wished to raise awareness about the Hana Grace Williams case. However, there’s a challenge in writing for national media, and that’s hitting on an issue in a way that merits national (in other words, generic) concern. Mr. Eckholm’s piece ran Nov. 6th. The unfortunate downside is that it didn’t allow space to discuss anything more specific than the human-interest social issues of the moment. As Linda pointed out, the need for generic balance ruled out much discussion of Pearl or the Williams case. Also, there’s no causal linkage between the Pearls and the Texas judge who beat his daughter and ended up on YouTube. Nor do the problems with TTUAC revolve around spanking, or Pearl’s advice on the matter.

Nor do the problems have much to do with the faux-pleasantly cruel, religious nutwing persona that the media applies to Pearl–and that Pearl seems to unwittingly cultivate every time he encounters a PR opportunity.

The problem, pure and simple, is that Mike Pearl does not teach Christian doctrines.

And while many commenters to the article did their best to articulate that Pearl is not representative of Christian belief and practice, many others were very happy to take him as such.

As I discussed with the Wartburg Watch gals recently, that lumping of bad apple into orange crop is going to continue happening with the media’s presentation of Pearl until Gospel-preaching Christian leaders draw a theological line in the sand.

If your church has these books, speak to them about it. If your church doesn’t have these books, speak to them about it–as this church did to its congregation. We have a theological review of the Pearls’ teachings available to assist.